What If You Won the Lottery? – Money Mailbox

by MoneyNing · 27 comments

Most people dream of winning the lottery, but most people underestimate the impact of such a extraordinary event. Whether you are ready or not, cashing the winning ticket is almost certainly a life changing event.

A couple weeks ago, our family decided to try our hands on a lucky game called the lottery. It was fun. After all, the jackpot was over $100 million dollars. I don’t know about the others, but I had a few dreams of my own that I wanted to fulfill. Of course, we didn’t win, but while looking at the options of cashing out, I noticed that you could either cash out in full, or get multiple annual payments for the next 26 years.

Many of you probably talked about this amongst your friends before, so I’m curious to know. Would you take the cash, or would you take the 26 equal payments over many years?

The Numbers

Perhaps $100 million is too high of a number, because picking either option gives you too much money (and therefore, choosing almost doesn’t matter). What if the jackpot was a more modest $12 million?

I checked the Mega Millions website, and they showed an example with such a number. Either take $7,042,000 all at once, or take $461,538 a year for 26 straight years. Both sound good right now I’m sure, but what if you actually had the option to pick just one?

Would you take several hundred thousand dollars up front, or would you take a very high paying job for the rest of your working life (if you decide to still work that is)? Oh, and before you answer, note that taxes will need to be taken out of both numbers, so only roughly half will actually be yours.

How I See It

I remember this exact conversation amongst our family before. Without much thought, I said I would like the money up front. $7 million dollars. I’d be set for life, and buy pretty much everything I ever wanted. Having cash in my hands is also much more flexible, and money right away, even though a smaller amount, seemed like a no-brainer.

Fast forward to today though, and my answer is different. I would take 26 payments of over $400k in a heart beat, even though it’s probably not the more popular choice. The reason is simple. Choosing annual equal payments ensures that my family is set for life.

Can you imagine getting $7 million dollars all at once? We all have dreams, and a large sum of money is too tempting. I know that if I have $7 million dollars pushed to me, I will probably buy a very luxurious car, and might even change my house without regards to the fact that I just purchased a home (actually, I haven’t even moved in yet.).

I might still get the same car with $400,000 a year, but I know that as long as I don’t borrow any money, I can splurge and be irresponsible all I want and I will get another $400,000 in a year.

Selfishly, $7 million up front is better. I can use the money to invest, or really try to grow my business. There’s a good chance I can significantly grow this figure, but what if it doesn’t pan out the way I want it to? Life can throw curve balls at you at anytime without warning. For my family, the 26-payment option is the more selfless thing to do. $400,000 a year for over two decades pretty much guarantees an extremely comfortable life for them. It’s definitely not as flashy, but boring is pretty good. Nothing wrong with that.

How about you? Leave your comments, and come on over to the site to read what others think too.

Money Saving Tip: An incredibly effective way to save more is to reduce your monthly Internet and TV costs. Click here for all the current AT&T DSL and U-VERSE promotions and see if you can save more money every month from now on.

Related Posts

{ 27 comments… read them below or add one }

Kevin May 14, 2010 at 6:49 am

Personally, I would probably take the lump sum. Say taxes eat 40% of the money, you would have about 4.2 million after all that. At a very conservative 2% investment return, you could have $84k each year to live on. Sure, it’s not the most money but you’re never touching the principal. You’re leaving your kids and descendants with 4.2 million. Actually, I try and imagine that I wouldn’t change my lifestyle all that much. So I would try and save on top of that and would potentially leave them with more.

It really depends on what I expect the investment returns to be like. It isn’t a whole lot of money but it is enough for me to live comfortably.

I guess I could take the lump sum, which would be like 240k annually after taxes, and try and save the majority of that. If saved properly, you should be able to have 4.2m or more in 26 years… and then be in the same spot as if you took the lump sum and just lived off the interest.

Regardless of which method I chose, I would try and ensure that there was several million left at the end of my life for my descendants. If I took the lump sum, I would be sure to never spend all of it. 400k a year does provide a very comfortable lifestyle… but the shock of going from that to nothing after 26 years would be too much for me. And then getting a job where you make maybe 50k… and still want to live a 400k lifestyle would be hard.

Reply

Eboni August 13, 2010 at 7:36 am

You have to work like you don’t have the money. Open you own business and don’t live too lavishly. After 26 years you will still have a lot if you plan correctly

Reply

Ann May 14, 2010 at 7:31 am

I’m already 58 years old. I’d take the lump sum. I might have 26 years left in my life, but who knows what tomorrow may bring? I’d help my family members, keep some to retire on (high interest account for retirement), and maybe buy the little cabin and land I live in. Might even try to go off-grid.

Reply

CD Rates Blog May 14, 2010 at 7:55 am

The scariest thing about either option is polling shows the largest majority of winners could not handle either option and were in worse shape just a couple of years down the line.

First, you have to be strong and steadfast in not going gang busters. It would be okay to do a few nice things, but the urge to retire should be put into the deepest, darkest recesses of your mind.

You have to resist “family and friends” that suddenly come out of the cabinets.

Regardless of how you take it, put it away in a safe place. For the most part, pretend you don’t have it.

cd :O)

Reply

Tony April 21, 2011 at 4:00 pm

I would countinue to shop with coupon and shop for deals and discounts. Also, I would save tons of money buy not getting married or having children.

Reply

AprilFire May 14, 2010 at 8:08 am

For me, it depends on timing. If I were to win it now (at 27), taking the annual payments would be best – invested wisely, it could grow nicely. If I won it later in life, say closer to 55, I’d take the lump sum. Either way, I’d use some of it to help others (charities I’ve been wanting to help in the past, but couldn’t; my grandparents, my sister and my parents), pay off debt and take a trip or two. There is no way I’d quit working, cuz I’d be bored stiff after three weeks off.

Of course, those of us that are frugal and budget conscience won’t be the ones winning the lottery. That would just be too perfect. :D ( I kid. )

Reply

marci357 May 14, 2010 at 8:21 am

My first phone call would be to my tax man.
Then he would set up an irrevokable family trust,
then the will would be updated,
all before I cashed in and took the lump sum.
My family will be set for life that way, but not have too much at any one time, and it will be there for the grandkids’ college etc later on.

Yes – my tax man and I have already discussed this :)

Reply

MoneyNing May 14, 2010 at 8:42 am

Lots of you asked, so here’s the answer. The 26 payments would still go to your beneficiary or estate if something were to happen to you.

Does this change your answer?

Reply

marci357 May 14, 2010 at 8:50 am

Nope. Still taking a lump sum into an irrevokable trust…. it protects the money from liabilities and lawsuits…

Reply

GoYanks May 14, 2010 at 8:57 am

Who says you have to choose? You can have both. Take a lump sump from Megamillion. Keep half of that to yourself and do whatever you want with this half. Invest the other half in annuities – income for life.

Personally, I can’t trust the state govt/megamillion to keep me paying for 26 yrs. I would take all at once.

Reply

Ann May 14, 2010 at 9:00 am

I guess it doesn’t change my answer at all. I’d rather hand some over to my beneficiaries myself than to trust an already bloated government beauocracy to do it for me.

Reply

Brian May 14, 2010 at 9:52 am

Interesting post. I too have dreamed about winning the MegaMillion jackpot the other week. There are numerous stories about how people one the lottery and utterly failed, went to prison, and now are broke. Just search the internet and look for “curse of the lottery”. As the saying goes, “If you are unhappy with $100, you’ll be unhappy with $100 million”. With that said, heres’s what I’d do:

Take the lump sum. You pay less in taxes over the long run. Put half into an investment account that earns a moderate 6%, and have it distribute $100,000/year into my bank account. The account would slowly grow and I would get a nice salary each year. That leaves $2.1 million, which I would donate half to my university, my summer camp, and a few other charities I help. Now I have $1 million left and with that I would pay off my family’s debt, provide for my parents in their golden years since they really have no savings, and buy a small 3br/2ba house. That would leave me with close to $100,000 left which I would just spend lavishly, thus getting the lottery euphoria out of my system. In addition, I would get a part-time job because I think the biggest problem with having large amounts of money at once is that you have too much time on your hands and then spend your fortune to quickly.

…no I haven’t thought about this at all… ;-)

Reply

Jenna May 14, 2010 at 12:51 pm

I have no idea what I would do. If it happened tomorrow think I would take the annual payments, just because I’m not sure I trust myself with so much money. But I would definitely have a meeting with close friends and family to make a decision. This is good daydreaming for a Friday afternoon…hmm…

How many readers of this blog actually buy lottery tickets? I’d be interested in knowing that. I’ve never bought one.

Reply

Squirrelers May 14, 2010 at 9:41 pm

Without getting into the numbers here, I would start with the concept of evaluating the present value of each alternative, accounting for all factors (discount rate, taxes, etc). All things being equal, I would choose cash in hand now. If deferred payments were just a bit better, I would still choose the lump sum. So basically, there would have to be a clear advantage, in present value terms, to installment payments for me to walk away from a lump some.

Cash in hand is better than a promise – that’s the overarching concept.

What a nice diversion…the age old game of thinking about what one would do in the event of winning a lottery:)

Reply

Stephan May 17, 2010 at 2:38 pm

I would take the annual payments, quit my day job, get a part time job at something i love, and always invest the 400k each year so that even after 26 years, i would still never have to work again

Reply

Harrken May 20, 2010 at 9:15 am

I would take the lump sum, ~ $4mil, and

1. Give myself $500k blow money to buy “all of the stuff I ever wanted” and set myself up, i.e. nice home, nice vehicle, etc.
2. Donate $1mil or so to worthy causes.
3. Put the rest is secure savings/investments, even if they had a low return, and take an annual payout.

Reply

Brianna May 23, 2010 at 11:59 am

You actually get more money if you accept the annual payments. The current mega millions jackpot is $64 million if you accept annual payments and about $41 million if you pick cash upfront. Same with the powerball jackpot: $199 million annuity, $99 million cash upfront. That’s an important factor to remember.

That said, it completely depends how much money I won. If I won the powerball I would take yearly payments, because it would still be millions a year.

Reply

Beverly July 15, 2010 at 11:12 am

My husband and I go back and forth with this one all the time. Still haven’t won so the decision is irrelevent.

However, the main reason all those people who win big and end up broke or in prison is maintenance. Buy a big house? you still have property tax EVERY YEAR, even after the 26 years and those keep going up, so splurge a bit, but be realistic.

We probably wouldn’t move, but we would renovate maybe a “different” cars, notice I didn’t say “new”. After that, BE VERY VERY CAREFUL WHO YOU TELL. The fewer people who know, the fewer “relatives” show up at your door. Discreatly help those you want to help.

Reply

Will November 23, 2010 at 6:41 am

Interesting discussion….The only thing I know for sure, is that I do not know enough to make an informed decision. Clearly, reading about an “irrevocable family trust” made me appreciative of one having researched the issue much further than I. I suspect there may be a “tipping point” in total amount where there would be no perceptible difference in lifestyle change regardless of which option were selected.

Reply

Tricia February 28, 2011 at 8:11 pm

I would take the lump sum since the promise of tomorrow’s payment is only that. A promise that has no absolute guarantee, it doesn’t sit well with me to place my trust in a promise, no matter who is backing it. After the tax is paid, I would buy two very modest, but solid houses. Absolutely no extravagance or flash. One to live in and one for my grandparents. Mine would have to have a good size of fertile land for a nice size garden. I would make sure to have invested some in gold/silver. I would buy two slightly used cars that are good on gas mileage & upkeep. I would invest 3/5 of the entire net amount into bonds, stocks and other types of investments. I would keep working at my current job for a year, giving me time to decide what type of career that will bring me the most joy and then pursue that training while working a little less than I do currently. I would live off my employement income with adding a mere $1000 a month from the winnings. I would not change my lifestyle noticeably. My splurge would be two vacations a year and a well qualified tutor for my children. I would also like to give some to a charity that will change lives, not just circumstances. I would not tell anybody I came into money and no one would be able to guess from my spending habits. Although, I mention it at the end of my list, I think the first thing I should do would be to obtain as much knowledge as I could regarding investing, economics, and pyschology.

Reply

Uncleduke316 March 15, 2011 at 8:56 am

The only sensible thing to do is take the annuity payment and move to Florida where there’s NO TAX ON LOTTERY PRIZES…. :) You just pay the federal income tax which is a pittance compared to what your left with and what you paid when you had a job. Then when you start getting two million and chage a year around your 22nd payment all you have to do is stick a million in your savings account. two percent on one million is 200,000. Do the math. THEN you can leave everything to your favorite charity.if your single DO NOT get married UNLESS SHE SIGNS AN IRON CLAD PRENUP. DO NOT HAVE KIDS if you don’t have any. if you do make sure they know they have to still get jobs because everything is going to charity.

Reply

Dave in St. Louis June 22, 2011 at 6:44 pm

I have unresectable cancer. Lump sum is the only thing that makes sense for me.

Reply

Billy November 28, 2011 at 5:26 pm

I think everyone that posted here is smarter than every athlete in the NBA and NFL. They have careers that lasts as long as their knees do and make a salary that equals a lottery ticket over their career. They live like kings for a few years and end up bankrupt. They don’t need financial planners, they need your advise… Kudos

Reply

kevin December 13, 2011 at 10:57 am

Uncle duke would lose all his money. How do you get 2% of one million equaling 200,000. “do the math” again.

Reply

Randy January 4, 2012 at 9:41 pm

I would purchase my mom is as property in put up a windmill farm .that would allow them to retire. there is no need for them to have the bust
there butts everyday at 71&72 years old to make ends meet .if anyone can help make this happen I would greatly appreciate it

Reply

Frank January 23, 2012 at 11:44 pm

I’ll give 10% of my earnings to Churches around my and thank God for my blessings. Then I’ll give half of the winnings to my parents. The rest I’ll invest in commodities and mutual funds. Probably blow some money on a vacation and buy a new home within means.

Reply

Jasmine February 2, 2012 at 8:13 am

I believe that I would want to take the lump sum. There are a lot of people I know and charities that I want to help, and I also can invest a portion of the money for annual paybacks. But I have a question. When you win a lump sum, and the federal government and the state takes the taxes out of it, you walk home with “x” amount of dollars in your pocket, do you ever have to pay taxes on that money again? Or just on the interest that you make while investing it? Also, if you have already paid the taxes on this money and you give half of it to your parents, do they end up paying “income taxes” on it because it is over the “$600.00 gift” (or whatever the amount is) when doing their income taxes for that year?

Also, if banks are only FDIC insured for only $250,000.00 what do multi-millionaires do with their money? How can you write a check for a million dollars unless you have that much in the bank, and how is it safe to keep several million in one bank? Ahhh…. yes I have thought and dreamed about winning. It’s so fun! But then I started thinking about the details, came up with a bunch of questions, and came searching for answers and found this cool site. I enjoyed reading everyone’s answers. God Bless Us, Everyone!

Reply

Leave a Comment