I invited Engineer to do a guest post as he helped answer many of my FICO scores on an earlier article. His site, Engineering My Finances, is dedicated to articles on personal finance and his approach to prepare for retirement. Below is his article about Biweekly Mortgage Payments so check out his site and the article!
—
A few years back, my sister told me of an offer from her mortgage company. Basically, the loan would be restructured so that 1/2 of the current monthly payment would be paid every two weeks, to align with the biweekly pay period of most people. Since there are 52 weeks per year, not 48, there are 26 paydays per year. If you make 1/2 month’s mortgage payment every payday, then effectively there are 13 payments made every year instead of 12, the loan is paid sooner, and less interest is paid over the life of the loan.
But there are more details to the offer. There’s a one-time fee of $300 to restructure the loan, and a $6 fee each month to pay for this “service”. The terms of this arrangement require that they automatically draft the money out of your checking account. (How much does that really cost?) These added fees do not reduce your balance, nor are they deductible from your income tax.
There is another approach that won’t impose the extra fees, and the cost is a little bit of planning on your part. Mark your paydays on a calendar. Approximately 1 month in every 6 will have 3 paydays instead of 2. On those months, send in an extra 1/2 month’s mortgage payment, filling out the payment coupon to indicate that the extra payment is to be applied to the loan principal. And if you really, really want to pay the one-time $300 fee and ongoing $6/month, you could add those to your monthly payments marking them to be applied to your principal. A $300 payment early in the loan would knock a few payments off the end of the mortgage period, since most of your early payments apply to interest, not the principal. (An example of the power of compounding, paying the $300 now would save perhaps $1000 in interest over the life of the loan.)
But I also told her that instead of applying any extra money to her mortgage, she should apply it to her credit card balances, which typically impose a higher interest rate and are not tax deductible in any case.
Now I see a recent article by David Bach (“The Automatic Millionaire”) at http://finance.yahoo.com/expert/article/millionaire/39312 . In it, David starts out by pointing out that those who have paid off their mortgage early were able to retire earlier than those who didn’t. Seems plausible to me. But then he goes on to use this as the basis to promote such plans as the one that I advised my sister to reject. He says that these plans cost $200-$400 to set up, and $2.50-$6.95 per payment. Furthermore, he lets on that it’s a third party who handles the transactions.
So let’s review:
– We’ve got a third party involved, which provides yet another opportunity for problems. If they don’t forward your payments, you’re the one on the hook with the mortgage company, and you’re the one out on the street or with a damaged credit report.
– Even at the low end of the setup fee range ($200), how long will it take to recover the cost? If your personal situation changes and in five years you have to sell the house, will you have recovered the setup fee and all of the per-transaction costs?
– Even at the low end of the per-transactions costs, the cost is $65/year. For $65, you can buy a calendar and at the beginning of the year spend 30 minutes circling your paydays, and note which months have 3 paydays. Then a couple of extra minutes each month when you write your mortgage check to look at the calendar you marked up to see how many paydays there were that month. So maybe an hour’s effort though the year, saves you $65 or more.
Even if you can get this service for free from the mortgage company, here are some other negatives that David Bach didn’t mention:
(1) If you have credit card debt, whether at a higher rate or possibly a slightly lower rate than your mortgage, then it makes no sense pay ahead on your mortgage. Why pay off a lower-rate debt for which the interest is possibly deductible from your taxes, when you have higher-interest and/or non-deductible debt that could be paid down instead?
(2) Entering such a plan locks you in to having to make the extra payments. By doing what I suggest, you can defer the extra payments toward principal if something happens. Such as being laid off, in which case you’re no longer getting that paycheck every two weeks.
Let me make it clear that I’m not opposed to paying ahead on your mortgage. In fact, I retired a 30-year mortgage in less than 12 years. I am opposed to taking on unnecessary expenses and risks to do so.
Yes, “automatic” is nice. But David’s so wrapped up in that theme that he won’t mention the negatives. It’s best to question the advice of media finance gurus, and not follow their advice blindly.
Promote or Save This Article
If you like this article, please consider bookmarking or helping us promote it!
Print Post | Email Post | Del.icio.us | Stumble it! | Reddit |
Related Posts
- When Mortgage Company goes out of business
- Mortgage Loan Calculator
- Disturbing Mortgage Ad from ING Direct
- Home Ownership is Still the American Dream
- Increasing Your Credit Score
Subscribe! (and Get a Mini-Course with Free Registration)
Follow me on twitter! In addition, subscribe to grab free amazing content or take advantage of the newsletter to have content delivered to you. For starters, a 7-part mini course to help you spend less and be happy will be delivered to you when you subscribe!(Don't worry about spam, because we hate it as much as you do!)

{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }
While it is best to pay off credit card debts and then, once they’re gone, never ever charge more than you have in your checking account in any given billing cycle, the observation that paying off your mortgage may allow you to retire earlier is true…and then some. When you get to be an old buzzard like me, you make an astonishing discovery:
Extremely nice houses (less work, less upkeep expense, lower taxes, lower insurance) in retirement communities (amazingly lower car insurance!) are to be had for lots less than you can sell your paid-off palace for. Yesterday, after recovering from a monster day of floor scrubbing, kitchen scouring, garage clean-up, bathroom sanitizing, yard maintenance, pool cleaning, and HD-schlepping, I cruised the MLS for smaller, lower-maintenance housing in a nearby retirement community. Lo! For $50,000 to $100,000 less than my house is presently worth, I can buy an exceptionally lovely, fairly new, well designed hovel on a good-sized lot with low-maintenance landscaping in what is now the hottest part of the city. Because developers have recently focussed on the area where those communities were originally built, all the lifestyle amenities we’ve had in the central and east districts have now moved out to the westside, and so Sun City residents are no longer rusticated to the cotton fields.
A $50,000 windfall added to my current retirement savings would allow me to can the job right now, today. Or I could keep the job (albeit with a hideous commute) until I’m 66, let that money continue to compound, and retire with cash flow guaranteed (not “maybe, if inflation never goes crazy again”) to equal my present salary. Hot dang!
Start with the high-interest debts…but for sure, pay down that mortgage as soon as you can!
vh: Nice to hear that someone can retire comfortably (or pretty close to doing so)!
As I comtemplate my house purchase here in Southern California, I always thought of how I will put a considerable percentage of my income in paying for the mortgage, which then becomes an asset that I cannot really cash because I need to live in it. Even though it’s extremely early at this point, I’m thinking of moving to another city when I retire and then selling my higher priced home to buy a small one, helping my after retirement income from the extra interest.
I think paying off the mortgages is like another way of forced savings which helps most people accumulate more wealth, even though mathematically it does not make sense.
When you pay off additional principal does it really affect how much interest you pay? My understanding is that the loan is fully amortized when you start, so if you put in say an extra thousand, it just means the loan is paid off a little quicker, but you still make the same monthly payment and pay the same amount of interest. Instead of 360 payments maybe you now make 359. Am I wrong about this? My mortgage broker implied I would need to “recast” the loan, with a large fee, to actually reduce the interest I will have to pay. Seems to me it is better to save the money and pay off mortgage all at once.
Carl: It is my understanding that the conventional loans will re-adjust the interest when you pay off extra. How often I believe depends on the Ts and Cs. If your broker is telling you otherwise, you might look into whether your loan has a early payment penalty that some loans have.
Everything should be explained in the “million-page” Ts and Cs document so read that up and see.