<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Down the Trenches Look at Traditional IRA vs 401k</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moneyning.com/401k/a-down-the-trenches-look-at-traditional-ira-vs-401k/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moneyning.com/401k/a-down-the-trenches-look-at-traditional-ira-vs-401k/</link>
	<description>A personal finance blog where we share insights on carefully saving money, investing, early retirement, mortgages, stocks because the little things matter in achieving financial freedom!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:01:45 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Blankenship, CFP®, EA</title>
		<link>http://moneyning.com/401k/a-down-the-trenches-look-at-traditional-ira-vs-401k/comment-page-1/#comment-15969</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Blankenship, CFP®, EA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 02:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyning.com/?p=2159#comment-15969</guid>
		<description>Two additional benefits to having a 401(k) plan:

1) Access to the account without penalty if you separate from service on or after age 55, due to §72(t)(2)(A)(v).  This is only allowed in a CODA plan, not in an IRA.
2) A vehicle to receive a rollover of after-tax contributions and growth in an IRA that has both before- and after-tax contributions when attempting to make a tax-free conversion to a Roth IRA, consisting solely of after-tax contributions.

Granted, these two provisions alone would not be good reasons to contribute to a 401(k) over an IRA or Roth IRA - but rather simply good reasons to have an account in your name.

jb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two additional benefits to having a 401(k) plan:</p>
<p>1) Access to the account without penalty if you separate from service on or after age 55, due to §72(t)(2)(A)(v).  This is only allowed in a CODA plan, not in an IRA.<br />
2) A vehicle to receive a rollover of after-tax contributions and growth in an IRA that has both before- and after-tax contributions when attempting to make a tax-free conversion to a Roth IRA, consisting solely of after-tax contributions.</p>
<p>Granted, these two provisions alone would not be good reasons to contribute to a 401(k) over an IRA or Roth IRA &#8211; but rather simply good reasons to have an account in your name.</p>
<p>jb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://moneyning.com/401k/a-down-the-trenches-look-at-traditional-ira-vs-401k/comment-page-1/#comment-14085</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 01:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyning.com/?p=2159#comment-14085</guid>
		<description>Help:
I started contributing to the Employee Savings Plan at Work in December, instead of waiting until January, and am facing an extra $1500 tax bill for 2008 as a result.  I am looking for a way to reduce that extra tax. 

I put $6000 into a 2008 IRA in April 2008, when I was a contract employee and not covered by a Employer&#039;s Savings Plan or Retirement Plan.  In late September I gained new employment and became eligible for my new Employer&#039;s savings plan starting in December.   So 3% was deducted pre-tax from my December paycheck only and my 2008 W-2 was marked indicating I was in a Savings Plan (401K).

Instead of being able to deduct the $6000 IRA, I am ineligible to claim it because  our combined AGI exceeds $105,000 --- (using the IRA Deduction Worksheet for line 32 of form 1040).  We also started an IRA for my wife at the same time, and since she is not covered by a Savings Plan, we can claim her complete deduction.  So I&#039;m facing extra taxes due to contributing to a Savings Plan for only one month in 2008.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Help:<br />
I started contributing to the Employee Savings Plan at Work in December, instead of waiting until January, and am facing an extra $1500 tax bill for 2008 as a result.  I am looking for a way to reduce that extra tax. </p>
<p>I put $6000 into a 2008 IRA in April 2008, when I was a contract employee and not covered by a Employer&#8217;s Savings Plan or Retirement Plan.  In late September I gained new employment and became eligible for my new Employer&#8217;s savings plan starting in December.   So 3% was deducted pre-tax from my December paycheck only and my 2008 W-2 was marked indicating I was in a Savings Plan (401K).</p>
<p>Instead of being able to deduct the $6000 IRA, I am ineligible to claim it because  our combined AGI exceeds $105,000 &#8212; (using the IRA Deduction Worksheet for line 32 of form 1040).  We also started an IRA for my wife at the same time, and since she is not covered by a Savings Plan, we can claim her complete deduction.  So I&#8217;m facing extra taxes due to contributing to a Savings Plan for only one month in 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MoneyNing</title>
		<link>http://moneyning.com/401k/a-down-the-trenches-look-at-traditional-ira-vs-401k/comment-page-1/#comment-14044</link>
		<dc:creator>MoneyNing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyning.com/?p=2159#comment-14044</guid>
		<description>AKP: From what I can tell, what you contribute to your 401k is irrelevant for your IRA, which is only based on the salary limit.  So yes, you can do both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AKP: From what I can tell, what you contribute to your 401k is irrelevant for your IRA, which is only based on the salary limit.  So yes, you can do both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AKP</title>
		<link>http://moneyning.com/401k/a-down-the-trenches-look-at-traditional-ira-vs-401k/comment-page-1/#comment-14043</link>
		<dc:creator>AKP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyning.com/?p=2159#comment-14043</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I have a question related to 401k and traditonal IRA.

Can a person contribute the maximum limit (i.e., $4000 for year 2008 to traditional IRA) as well as deduct 401k (say $12000 for year 2008). One person told me that we can&#039;t contribute in both of them for the same year if the salary is around 100K. 

Thanks,
AKP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I have a question related to 401k and traditonal IRA.</p>
<p>Can a person contribute the maximum limit (i.e., $4000 for year 2008 to traditional IRA) as well as deduct 401k (say $12000 for year 2008). One person told me that we can&#8217;t contribute in both of them for the same year if the salary is around 100K. </p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
AKP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy</title>
		<link>http://moneyning.com/401k/a-down-the-trenches-look-at-traditional-ira-vs-401k/comment-page-1/#comment-13289</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyning.com/?p=2159#comment-13289</guid>
		<description>The minimum investment is one reason why I follow the advice here, as well as many others to investing in an index fund instead of those high fee mutual funds!

My investment is down right now but I&#039;m sure it will come back!  I just have faith!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The minimum investment is one reason why I follow the advice here, as well as many others to investing in an index fund instead of those high fee mutual funds!</p>
<p>My investment is down right now but I&#8217;m sure it will come back!  I just have faith!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stock Investing Guru</title>
		<link>http://moneyning.com/401k/a-down-the-trenches-look-at-traditional-ira-vs-401k/comment-page-1/#comment-13285</link>
		<dc:creator>Stock Investing Guru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyning.com/?p=2159#comment-13285</guid>
		<description>I think employer match is awesome. Everyone please take advantage if your company does that. It&#039;s FREE money to your retirement. 

Also, I would suggest starting an IRA as a side retirement vehicle to your 401k if you are legally allowed to do so. I have not looked into it that much as I am an independent contractor, not employee. You will thank yourself later for creating a second retirement reserve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think employer match is awesome. Everyone please take advantage if your company does that. It&#8217;s FREE money to your retirement. </p>
<p>Also, I would suggest starting an IRA as a side retirement vehicle to your 401k if you are legally allowed to do so. I have not looked into it that much as I am an independent contractor, not employee. You will thank yourself later for creating a second retirement reserve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://moneyning.com/401k/a-down-the-trenches-look-at-traditional-ira-vs-401k/comment-page-1/#comment-13283</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyning.com/?p=2159#comment-13283</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t look at it as an either or solution, because the contribution limits on an IRA are pretty low.   I&#039;ve always maxed out a Roth IRA, then contribtued to the 401K to get full match.  Finally I adjusted the amount over full match depending on curcumstances.

Fund fees suck but I suspect taxes are an even worse drag...  Actually a very useful follow up article would be:   At what % fees would it make sense to forgo tax sheltering of a 401K?       

You would have to make some assumptions about future tax policies, allot for some lower returns of tax efficient funds and pick some investment lengths like 10,20, 30 years...  

-Rick Francis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t look at it as an either or solution, because the contribution limits on an IRA are pretty low.   I&#8217;ve always maxed out a Roth IRA, then contribtued to the 401K to get full match.  Finally I adjusted the amount over full match depending on curcumstances.</p>
<p>Fund fees suck but I suspect taxes are an even worse drag&#8230;  Actually a very useful follow up article would be:   At what % fees would it make sense to forgo tax sheltering of a 401K?       </p>
<p>You would have to make some assumptions about future tax policies, allot for some lower returns of tax efficient funds and pick some investment lengths like 10,20, 30 years&#8230;  </p>
<p>-Rick Francis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt @ StupidCents</title>
		<link>http://moneyning.com/401k/a-down-the-trenches-look-at-traditional-ira-vs-401k/comment-page-1/#comment-13279</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt @ StupidCents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyning.com/?p=2159#comment-13279</guid>
		<description>@Sandy

I don&#039;t put in $5,000 lump sum, but I will put in large chunks.  A couple of reasons...

1) Most funds require a minimum investment, most are $1,000 and some even $4,000+. 
2) When I do purchase a fund (or stock), there is a trading fee.  I know there are free brokerage firms, but I chose a brokerage that allows me flexibility of choosing a wide variety of funds.  So with that in mind, I make larger purchases to absorb the fees.
3) I make more money in my high interest savings account than the money market fund my broker uses.

Along your same lines, I do budget a certain amount to retirement, I just don&#039;t find it necessary to do it in pieces during the year.

Stupidly Yours,

Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sandy</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t put in $5,000 lump sum, but I will put in large chunks.  A couple of reasons&#8230;</p>
<p>1) Most funds require a minimum investment, most are $1,000 and some even $4,000+.<br />
2) When I do purchase a fund (or stock), there is a trading fee.  I know there are free brokerage firms, but I chose a brokerage that allows me flexibility of choosing a wide variety of funds.  So with that in mind, I make larger purchases to absorb the fees.<br />
3) I make more money in my high interest savings account than the money market fund my broker uses.</p>
<p>Along your same lines, I do budget a certain amount to retirement, I just don&#8217;t find it necessary to do it in pieces during the year.</p>
<p>Stupidly Yours,</p>
<p>Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy</title>
		<link>http://moneyning.com/401k/a-down-the-trenches-look-at-traditional-ira-vs-401k/comment-page-1/#comment-13278</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyning.com/?p=2159#comment-13278</guid>
		<description>I always contribute $415 each month into my IRA account.  I keep hearing that most people just put in that $5000 lump sum but I never got why people have that much money.

It works out for me because I keep investing and after a while, I have lots accumulated which makes me happy :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always contribute $415 each month into my IRA account.  I keep hearing that most people just put in that $5000 lump sum but I never got why people have that much money.</p>
<p>It works out for me because I keep investing and after a while, I have lots accumulated which makes me happy <img src='http://moneyning.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt @ StupidCents</title>
		<link>http://moneyning.com/401k/a-down-the-trenches-look-at-traditional-ira-vs-401k/comment-page-1/#comment-13277</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt @ StupidCents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyning.com/?p=2159#comment-13277</guid>
		<description>I personally like a Roth IRA [over a traditional IRA and] over a 401k because I like the flexibility of choosing my own funds.  In rare instances, some 401k offerings do allow a self-directed option.  I, however, do not have that luxury.

After we max out both my wife&#039;s and my rIRA (currently $5,000), we only contribute enough to our 401k to get the full employer match.  No reason to throw away free money.

While I&#039;m no investor &#039;guru&#039; I pride myself in at least beating the market.  Even though I do my research in choosing the best funds the 401k allows, my returns have always been better in both our rIRA&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally like a Roth IRA [over a traditional IRA and] over a 401k because I like the flexibility of choosing my own funds.  In rare instances, some 401k offerings do allow a self-directed option.  I, however, do not have that luxury.</p>
<p>After we max out both my wife&#8217;s and my rIRA (currently $5,000), we only contribute enough to our 401k to get the full employer match.  No reason to throw away free money.</p>
<p>While I&#8217;m no investor &#8216;guru&#8217; I pride myself in at least beating the market.  Even though I do my research in choosing the best funds the 401k allows, my returns have always been better in both our rIRA&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
